 Excelsior Refit Official Poll |
  |
Rob Caves, Executive Producer, Editor, 3D Artist
 Group: Root Posts: 5,476 Joined: 6-February 03 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 4  |
 Dec 18 2007, 10:37 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Poll closes at month's end.
|
|
 |
 
|
Lieutenant Commander
 Captain of the USS Intrepid II - NCC-1738 Group: Members Posts: 751 Joined: 14-October 05 From: Glendale, California Member No.: 1,984 |
Dec 19 2007, 01:41 PM
Post
#2
|
|
I voted for the standard 2 nacelled version. I admit it.
|
|
|
|
|
Rick Pike - Public Relations Pirate
 I would neverr join a group that would have me as a member... Group: HF Productions Cast / Crew Posts: 4,322 Joined: 12-February 07 From: Maryland/Wash DC area Member No.: 3,134 |
Dec 19 2007, 01:43 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Now I am intrigued to see what 2.5 nacelles looks like...
|
|
|
|
|
Lieutenant
 Seth Kingsley Group: Members Posts: 462 Joined: 28-September 06 From: Bham, UK Member No.: 2,942 |
Dec 19 2007, 02:20 PM
Post
#4
|
|
I am assuming its the best of both, i.e. the extra little cannons and launchers etc?
|
|
|
|
|
Lieutenant
 Group: Members Posts: 458 Joined: 28-June 07 From: Southend on Sea England Member No.: 3,340 |
Dec 19 2007, 02:25 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Voted for the three nacelle version, I'm up for keeping the ship the same.
|
|
|
|
|
Ensign
Group: New Members Posts: 2 Joined: 19-December 07 Member No.: 3,854 |
Dec 19 2007, 02:32 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Hi, I'm pretty new here, but I also prefer the classic
|
|
|
|
|
Admiral
 Harman Rabb in Starfleet? Group: Members Posts: 9,599 Joined: 14-April 05 From: Atlanta, GA Member No.: 1,480 |
Dec 19 2007, 03:16 PM
Post
#7
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
Commodore
 Capt. Bruce J. Space, U.S.S. Eagle Star Group: Members Posts: 4,267 Joined: 17-September 04 From: Washington DC, United States Member No.: 702 |
Dec 19 2007, 03:32 PM
Post
#8
|
|
I prefer the three, but I am in favor of a compromise. :)
|
|
|
|
|
Lieutenant
 Group: Members Posts: 306 Joined: 21-July 05 Member No.: 1,693 |
Dec 19 2007, 05:48 PM
Post
#9
|
|
I vote for a compromise along the lines of:
1) The nacelle replaced with a mission-specific pod 2) A crewperson (perhaps Lefler) wistfully noting the fact that the nacelle's no longer there. Just as a touch of respect. Thanks, Chris |
|
|
|
|
|
Ensign
Group: Members Posts: 9 Joined: 15-June 07 Member No.: 3,328 |
Dec 19 2007, 06:07 PM
Post
#10
|
|
I voted for 3, don't fix it if it isn't broke.
|
|
|
|
|
Lieutenant J.G.
 Group: Members Posts: 67 Joined: 19-February 05 From: Sittingbourne, Kent, UK Member No.: 1,248 |
Dec 19 2007, 07:44 PM
Post
#11
|
|
I voted for two nacelles, albeit more powerful, but with the mission specific item where the third would have been.
The Excelsior could become the ship that Starfleet send into problem areas for troubleshooting missions. More powerful engines, and enough equipment to make the A-Team a little excited. It could also be a testbed for new equipment. |
|
|
|
|
Lieutenant J.G.
 Group: Members Posts: 74 Joined: 14-June 05 From: Northwest Ohio Member No.: 1,628 |
Dec 19 2007, 08:16 PM
Post
#12
|
|
I'm agreeing with a few others here.
Go with 2 (albeit uprated versions) and a Mission Pod (similar to a Nebula class) where the 3rd used to be. |
|
|
|
|
Lieutenant J.G.
 Group: Members Posts: 101 Joined: 28-December 06 From: Dallas, TX Member No.: 3,069 |
Dec 20 2007, 07:19 AM
Post
#13
|
|
Go with 2 but add some new features
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lieutenant Commander
Group: Members Posts: 637 Joined: 15-December 05 From: OC, CA Member No.: 2,096 |
Dec 20 2007, 09:54 AM
Post
#14
|
|
Could a smaller third nacelle be integrated into the saucer design? Keeping the lines similar (though probably streamlined), but giving the third nacelle an obvious purpose (warp capable saucer) while also updating the look of the ship overall...
Dan |
|
|
|
|
Fleet Captain
 We be unveiling two new models on or about may 21,2011 Group: Members Posts: 2,436 Joined: 14-March 07 From: freeport , G.B.I. Member No.: 3,172 |
Dec 20 2007, 10:24 AM
Post
#15
|
|
mission pod? like a otter pool ? 3 is good 2 is fine .
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lieutenant J.G.
Group: Members Posts: 101 Joined: 28-December 06 From: Dallas, TX Member No.: 3,069 |
Dec 21 2007, 04:55 AM
Post
#16
|
|
giving the third nacelle an obvious purpose (warp capable saucer) I really like that idea and it you be a reason to have a third nacelle. The only thing would be to make it look good |
|
|
|
|
Admiral
 Admiral KUJ - Chief Recruiter of the Elite StarFleet Man Candy Corp. Join Today! Group: Members Posts: 8,650 Joined: 21-June 06 From: Kansas Member No.: 2,538 |
Dec 21 2007, 05:02 AM
Post
#17
|
|
Could a smaller third nacelle be integrated into the saucer design? Keeping the lines similar (though probably streamlined), but giving the third nacelle an obvious purpose (warp capable saucer) while also updating the look of the ship overall... Dan okay that would just be cool. Especially if we get to see shots of Excelsior seperating and both sections going into warp. |
|
|
|
|
Commodore
 Despite all my rage.. Group: Members Posts: 4,282 Joined: 21-April 05 From: Australia. Yes - the "Down Under" one. Member No.: 1,536 |
Dec 21 2007, 07:01 AM
Post
#18
|
|
What about... 4?
No, listen for a sec. the "Engineering" section of the Excelsior could be thicker, and there are only two noticable warp nacelles (as per normal) However, when "ludicrous speed" is required, two more warp nacelles can 'pop out' from the engineering section, their job being to create a warp bubble within the bubble, or in other words, allowing for much, much faster speeds over a short period of time, say. |
|
|
|
|
|
Admiral
Admiral KUJ - Chief Recruiter of the Elite StarFleet Man Candy Corp. Join Today! Group: Members Posts: 8,650 Joined: 21-June 06 From: Kansas Member No.: 2,538 |
Dec 21 2007, 07:25 AM
Post
#19
|
|
You will need an indicator light.
 I think that would be a cool effect to see additional nacelles popping out of the ship. |
|
|
|
|
Michael Hudson, Website Staff
 http://www.youtube.com/hiddenfrontier Group: Website Staff Posts: 3,008 Joined: 27-August 06 From: Cambridge, United Kingdom Member No.: 2,837 |
Dec 21 2007, 07:42 AM
Post
#20
|
|
You will need an indicator light. I think that would be a cool effect to see additional nacelles popping out of the ship. It's a starship Jim, not a robot in disguise... ;) |
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th June 2013 - 01:48 PM |
Powered By IP.Board
© 2013 IPS, Inc.