![]() ![]() |
Lieutenant Commander![]() Group: Members Posts: 692 Joined: 9-May 06 From: Houston, Texas Member No.: 2,423 |
Apr 2 2010, 08:56 AM
Post
#41
|
|
Given that it's hundreds of years in the future, the Frontier Guard could have a very different system, loosely based on what, to them, would be ancient historical systems.
I note the UK Royal Navy uses "Lieutenant, Sub-Lieutenant, and Midshipman," where Sub-Lieutenant is an officer and Midshipman seems to be not quite a cadet and not quite an officer. That could be interesting for FG. I looked into how US and UK Naval ranks were structured during the Napoleonic era, such as in the Horatio Hornblower and Master and Commander / Aubrey-Maturin books. They had Admirals and Commodores as flag officers commanding fleets or bases, Captains or Commanders could captain any ship, though any officer rank might captain a ship. Lieutenants were generally the executive officers and there were First, Second, and Third Lieutenants' positions (not ranks) one for each watch. There wasn't a very complex rank system, as even large ships had few officers. Midshipmen were apprentice or student officers in training aboard ship. In that time, and up until shortly before the Civil War in America, Midshipmen could be anywhere from 12 or 13 up through 18 or older, depending on when they were enrolled and when they passed their Lieutenant's exam to become a full officer. Instead of Petty Officers, there were Warrant Officers. Then there were ordinary Seamen. Apparently, there was some way of distinguishing an experienced hand from a new recruit. There were also children for deck hands, gun crews (powder monkeys) and cabin boys, often poor or orphaned kids, and those could be 6 to 12 or older. Children worked and were expected to be responsible... or they were punished. The adults could be punished too. So any given ship would have children, teenagers, and adults, all males, in what we'd think of as very poor conditions for food, hygiene, and privacy, all serving together. The kids and teens were raised to work as part of the crew. One of the major differences was that crewmen could be pressed into service, impressed, shanghaied. A ship in need of crew could simply come into port and order some man or boy into naval service as crewmen, either ordered or conned into it or outright abducted, and it was legal and ordinary business to do so. Officers or crew from civilian ships/boats could also be inducted into service. And you thought the friendly neighborhood recruitment office or that draft registration notice was rough! Civilian ships and boats were run similarly. Discipline was barbaric by our standards. Army commissions could be bought. Yes, bought, if your family was wealthy or noble enough. Apparently, Navy commissions were more earned; even a noble or a professional (doctor, lawyer, etc.) or a wealthy merchant family still had to have their sons go through as Midshipmen to learn how to sail and serve as a Naval officer, before passing an exam to become an officer. I'm mentioning that, not to praise it, but because it's an entirely different cultural standard, and because that provides a different take on how things might be run in the future in space colonization, and because there are some interesting possibilities for plots there. I've been listening to some of those old radio sci-fi serials on the X-Minus One podcast and a couple of others, including some old Tom Corbett radio shows. What's interesting from those, and what was puzzling to me at first, is that they were geared mostly at juveniles (kids and teens) and young adults, but the content was more mature in concepts and breadth and occasional scariness than what's usually given to a younger audience today. It took me awhile to figure out the difference. The youth back then were expected to be responsible, to work at school and at home or in the neighborhood, whether that was on a farm or ranch or in town. They were expected to be more mature, and expected to be capable of good English and math and other subjects, not just the three R's. They were also expected not to date until around late high school, and for goodness sakes, not to "get fresh" or (gasp) know about or try out anything... well, one doesn't talk about such things, but young Mabel down the street had to go see her Aunt Edna after she and that boy.... In other words, those old-time radio shows, science fiction and fantasy for kids and teens and young adults, were intended for an audience who were more mature and responsible and well educated. The expectation was still there that anyone of school age could hold down a responsible task and help the family or community to prosper. That's another main point, it seems to me, for what might be different in future space colonization. -- As far as the cadets and teachers and officers go, the Frontier Guard and the society they come from could be very different from ours. So far, the show hasn't shown a lot of what makes them different. |
|
|
|
|
EQX Executive Producer
![]() Group: HF Productions Cast / Crew Posts: 535 Joined: 10-December 08 From: Minnesota, United States SSP Member No.: 4,304 |
Apr 6 2010, 08:31 AM
Post
#42
|
|
here's my idea
officers[ ensign lt.ensign lieutenant lt.captain captain major major colonel colonel lt.commander commander flag officers rear general vice general general fleet general grand general grand admiral frontier guard Commander what do you think? This post has been edited by admiralrea: Apr 6 2010, 08:34 AM |
|
|
|
|
Lieutenant J.G.![]() nothing is impossible, it just takes a long time to achieve it. Group: Members Posts: 150 Joined: 20-February 10 Member No.: 4,727 |
Jul 29 2010, 04:15 PM
Post
#43
|
|
how about this for rank structure:
Cadet ranks Cadet I-class Cadet-II cadet III-class Cadet IV-class Non-Commissioned Officers Petty Officer I-class Petty Officer II-class Petty Officer III-class Chief Petty Officer Master Chief Petty officer Commissioned officers Ensign Sub-Lieutenant Lieutenant Major Colonel Lieutenant-Commander Commander Flag Officers Commodore Rear Admiral Forward Admiral Fleet Admiral Frontier Guardian CDR_DAXIAN This post has been edited by CDR_DAXIAN: Jul 29 2010, 04:26 PM |
|
|
|
|
Fleet Captain![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,713 Joined: 26-January 07 Member No.: 3,114 |
Jul 30 2010, 02:22 AM
Post
#44
|
|
The classes should be the other way around.
|
|
|
|
|
Lieutenant J.G.![]() nothing is impossible, it just takes a long time to achieve it. Group: Members Posts: 150 Joined: 20-February 10 Member No.: 4,727 |
Jul 30 2010, 12:16 PM
Post
#45
|
|
oops
|
|
|
|
|
Lieutenant J.G.![]() nothing is impossible, it just takes a long time to achieve it. Group: Members Posts: 150 Joined: 20-February 10 Member No.: 4,727 |
Jul 30 2010, 12:17 PM
Post
#46
|
|
Cadet ranks
Cadet IV-class Cadet-III-class cadet II-class Cadet I-class Non-Commissioned Officers Petty Officer I-class Petty Officer II-class Petty Officer III-class Chief Petty Officer Master Chief Petty officer Commissioned officers Ensign Sub-Lieutenant Lieutenant Major Colonel Lieutenant-Commander Commander Flag Officers Commodore Rear Admiral Forward Admiral Fleet Admiral Frontier Guardian This post has been edited by CDR_DAXIAN: Jul 30 2010, 12:18 PM |
|
|
|
|
Fleet Captain![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,713 Joined: 26-January 07 Member No.: 3,114 |
Jul 30 2010, 04:18 PM
Post
#47
|
|
YAY!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Admiral![]() Harman Rabb in Starfleet? Group: Members Posts: 9,594 Joined: 14-April 05 From: Atlanta, GA Member No.: 1,480 |
Jul 30 2010, 04:22 PM
Post
#48
|
|
Uh, aren't you forgetting Captain between Commander and Commodore?
|
|
|
|
|
Fleet Captain![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,713 Joined: 26-January 07 Member No.: 3,114 |
Jul 30 2010, 04:43 PM
Post
#49
|
|
Why?
Commander pretty much says it all. The Romulans only use Commander. |
|
|
|
|
Lieutenant J.G.![]() nothing is impossible, it just takes a long time to achieve it. Group: Members Posts: 150 Joined: 20-February 10 Member No.: 4,727 |
Jul 31 2010, 09:31 AM
Post
#50
|
|
QUOTE from what I've seen FG uses a mix of army and navy rank. Like Battlestar Galactica Plus: captain and commander just puts an earthquake on who's got more authority, i think it mixes you up i mean think of it, what do you think] "the captain's superior officer: commander -------" now if you think navy: that's the wrong way if you think army, there's no reference. that's why i think it screws you up. CDR_DAXIAN This post has been edited by CDR_DAXIAN: Aug 24 2010, 08:17 AM |
|
|
|
|
Lieutenant J.G.![]() Group: Members Posts: 51 Joined: 5-June 10 Member No.: 4,800 |
Sep 8 2010, 08:24 PM
Post
#51
|
|
Rank has two meanings, purely symbolic, and physical. A baron could be a baron because they run a plot of land called a barony, or they could be one because they are merely being honored with a traditional rank.
In FG you can have ranks based upon ancient traditions all you like, and that is fine. You could also have ranks with specific meaning. Ignoring troops, soldiers, and ground units as somehting for other branches to deal with what do we actually need to think about with space rankings? You have base rankings and ship rankings. Bases can be deep space: not near a star system (Not related to the star trek DS stations.) Strategic: in a place of military importance. Support: in a place of indirect military importance. or Civilian: Important, but not military. The command structure of such bases could, hypothetically, be organized arround practicality. If you are in charge of a minor base you are ranked, X. If you are in charge of a Major base you are ranked Y. If you are a regional commander in charge of several bases you are ranked z. Similarly ships might have a ranking related to their importance and use. In most SF settings you have large slow moving "capital" ships, or large numbers of fast moving "Fighter" ships. Several fighters (rank A) might serve under a wing commander (Rank B). Wing commanders, one or several, answer to the commander of a larger ship or a base (Rank C). Several capital ships serve a regional or fleet commander (Rank D) Now within each ship or each base there are also different ranks. Some military and some civilian. A base in a merchant sector might have an office for the guy in charge of mercantile relations. A base that is only important as a strike point on two different sectors might have a sector lead for each important sector. A production base might have a commander in charge of each type of production. What I am getting at here is that ranks can be simple simbols of office, or they might be something more. They might have specific meaning. |
|
|
|
|
Lieutenant J.G.![]() nothing is impossible, it just takes a long time to achieve it. Group: Members Posts: 150 Joined: 20-February 10 Member No.: 4,727 |
Sep 9 2010, 05:09 AM
Post
#52
|
|
that's a little too many ranks to remember saharda
three different ranks, and starbases alone? nice idea, but i think that's a little too many for me This post has been edited by CDR_DAXIAN: Sep 9 2010, 05:10 AM |
|
|
|
|
Lieutenant J.G.![]() nothing is impossible, it just takes a long time to achieve it. Group: Members Posts: 150 Joined: 20-February 10 Member No.: 4,727 |
Sep 16 2010, 05:45 PM
Post
#53
|
|
to add to description to my ranking structure:
Cadet ranks Cadet IV-class: one vertical pip Cadet-III-class: two vertical pips cadet II-class: three vertical pips Cadet I-class: four vertical pips Non-Commissioned Officers Petty Officer III-class: one horizontal bar Petty Officer II-class: two horizontal bars Petty Officer II-class: three horizontal bars Chief Petty Officer: three horizontal bars split by one vertical in center Master Chief Petty officer: three horizontal bars split by two vertical in center Commissioned officers Ensign: one bar Sub-Lieutenant: one and a half bars Lieutenant: two bars Major: three bars Colonel: four bars Lieutenant-Commander: four and a half bars Commander: five bars Flag Officers Commodore: two vertical one horizontal bar Rear Admiral: two vertical and two horizontal bars Forward Admiral: two vertical three horizontal bars Fleet Admiral: four vertical and three horizontal bars Frontier Guardian: eight point star (both sides of collar) This post has been edited by CDR_DAXIAN: Sep 16 2010, 05:46 PM |
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 18th May 2013 - 04:01 PM |